Sexual Crimes in Conflict Database

A collection of relevant literature and case law

Showing 1 to 10 of 33 results.

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Coric Nedzad et al.

    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Rape Camps Rape Rape/Sexual Violence in Prison

    Reference link
    http://www.sudbih.gov.ba/predmet/3718/show
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Nedzad Coric, Jure Kordic, Drazen Lovric, Dario Susac, Nedzad Tinjak, Nuhan Sikalo, Dario Mihalj, Stanko Skobic, Tomislav Ancic, Marinko Sunjic, Slavko Golemac
    Charges
    The Indictment charged the accused with the commission of the following criminal offenses: Nedzad Coric, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraphs e) and g) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 29 and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Jure Kordic, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraphs e), a) and f) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 29 and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Drazen Lovric, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraph e) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 29 and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Dario Susac, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraphs e), f) and g) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 29 and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Nedzad Tinjak, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraphs e), k), f) and g) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 29 and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Nuhan Sikalo, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraph g) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Dario Mihalj, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraphs g) and f) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 29 and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Stanko Skobic, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraph e) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 29 and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Tomislav Anci, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraph g) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Marinko Sunjic, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraph g) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 180(1) of the CC BiH; Slavko Golemac, the criminal offense of Crimes against Humanity in violation of Article 172(1)(h), in connection with sub-paragraph e) of the CC BiH, as read with Article 29 and Article 180(1) of the CC BiH.
    Status
    2778
    Case number
    S1 1 K 027427 18 Kri

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Dusko Knezevic (“Mejakic et al.”)

    Year
    2009
    Issues
    Modes of Liability
    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Rape Sexual Violence Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Persecution on Sexual Grounds Camp

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/1063
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Dusko Knezevic
    Charges
    Knezevic was indicted on 14 July 2006 (indictment confirmed) for charges of crimes against humanity, including sexual violence (rape and other forms of sexual abuse) (Article 172(g) of the Criminal Code of BiH), under Articles 29 (accomplice) and 180(1) (individual responsibility) of CC BiH. Knezevic participated in abuses and persecutions committed during the period from 30 April to the end of 1992 against the non-Serbs in the territory of the Prijedor municipality; about 7000 non-Serb civilians were subjected to capturing, taking to and arbitrary confinement at the Omarska and Keraterm camps, as part of the plan of permanent removal of the non-Serbs.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 30 May 2008, the Trial Panel found Knezevic guilty of crimes against humanity, including sexual violence (rape and other forms of sexual abuse), under Article 180(1), for: “rape and other forms of sexual abuse of the detainees directly or personally committed by persons other than Dusko Knezevic but in furtherance of the described system of ill-treatment and persecution at the camp in which he participated, including witness K019 who was raped on numerous occasions by the camp guards; witness K027 who was sexually assaulted by the shift Commander Mlado Radic and in July 1992 by Nedeljko Grabovac; witness K040 who was sexually abused twice by camp guard Lugar.” These events related to the Omarska camp. In addition, Knezevic was also found guilty of sexual violence committed in Keraterm camp
    sentencing
    Knezevic was sentenced to 31 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 16 February 2009, Knezevic's conviction and sentence was upheld on appeal. However, the mode of liability was changed from Article 180(1) to liability on the grounds of JCE.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    X-KRŽ-06/200

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Momcilo Gruban (“Mejakic et al.”)

    Year
    2009
    Issues
    Modes of Liability Sentencing and Reparations
    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Mitigating Circumstances Rape Sexual Abuse Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE)

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/1063
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Momcilo Gruban
    Charges
    Gruban was indicted on 14 July 2006 (indictment confirmed) for charges of crimes against humanity, including sexual violence. (Article 172(g) of the Criminal Code of BiH), under Articles 29 (accomplice) and 180(1) and (2) (individual and command responsibility) of CC BiH. Gruban participated in abuses and persecutions committed during the period from 30 April to the end of 1992 against the non-Serbs in the territory of the Prijedor municipality; about 7000 non-Serb civilians were subjected to capturing, taking to and arbitrary confinement at the Omarska and Keraterm camps, as part of the plan of permanent removal of the non-Serbs.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 30 May 2008, the Trial Panel found Gruban guilty of crimes against humanity, including sexual violence (rape and other forms of sexual abuse), under Article 180(1) and (2), for: “rape and other forms of sexual abuse of detainees directly or personally committed by persons outside of the shift that was under Momcilo Gruban’s command but in furtherance of the described system of ill-treatment and persecution at the camp in which he participated, including witness K027 who was sexually assaulted by the shift Commander Mlado Radic and on another occasion in July 1992 by Nedeljko Grabovac, witness K019, who was raped on numerous occasions by camp guards and witness K040 who was sexually abused twice by camp guard Lugar.” All related to events in the Omarska camp.
    sentencing
    Gruban was sentenced to 11 years’ imprisonment which was reduced to 7 years on appeal.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 16 February 2009, Gruban’s conviction was upheld on appeal. However, the mode of liability was changed from Article 180(1) and (2) to liability on the grounds of JCE. Gruban’s sentence was, however, reduced as the Appellate Panel found that the Trial Panel had not properly taken into consideration the mitigating factors in his case, namely that Gruban had in several instances helped detained people in order to at least alleviate their suffering. Gruban’s sentence was therefore reduced to 7 years’ imprisonment.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    X-KRZ-06/200

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber) - Zeljko Mejaki (“Mejakic et al.”)

    Year
    2009
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes Modes of Liability
    Country
    Bosnia Herzegovina
    Keywords
    Rape Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Persecution on Sexual Grounds Sexual Assault/Attack/Abuse

    Reference link
    http://www.internationalcrimesdatabase.org/Case/1063
    Type of mechanism
    Domestic court
    Name of mechanism
    Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (War Crimes Chamber)
    Name of accused
    Zeljko Mejakic
    Charges
    Mejakic was indicted on 14 July 2006 (indictment confirmed) for charges of crimes against humanity, including sexual violence (Article 172(g) of the Criminal Code of BiH), under Articles 29 (accomplice) and 180(1) and (2) (individual and command responsibility) of CC BiH. Mejakic participated in abuses and persecutions committed during the period from 30 April to the end of 1992 against the non-Serbs in the territory of the Prijedor municipality; about 7000 non-Serb civilians were subjected to capturing, taking to and arbitrary confinement at the Omarska and Keraterm camps, as part of the plan of permanent removal of the non-Serbs.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 30 May 2008, the Trial Panel found Mejakic guilty of crimes against humanity, including sexual violence, under Article 180(1) and (2), for: “rapes and other forms of sexual abuse of detainees committed by persons over whom Zeljko Mejakic had effective control and which rapes and sexual abuse were committed in furtherance of the described system of ill-treatment and persecution at the camp in which he participated, including witness K019 who was sexually abused on numerous occasions by the camp guards; witness K027 who was sexually assaulted by the Shift Commander Mlado Radic and on another occasion in July 1992 by Nedeljko Grabovac; witness K040 who was sexually assaulted twice by camp guard Lugar.” All related to events in the Omarska camp.
    sentencing
    Mejakic was sentenced to 21 years’ imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 16 February 2009, Mejakic’s conviction and sentence was upheld on appeal. However, the mode of liability was changed from Article 180(1) and (2) to liability on the grounds of JCE.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    X-KRZ-06/200

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ECCC - Kaing Guek Eav (“Duch”)

    Year
    2012
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Cambodia
    Keywords
    Penetration Reparation Vagina Rape/Sexual Violence in Detention Rape with Foreign Objects Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Kunarac

    Reference link
    https://www.eccc.gov.kh/en/case/topic/90
    Type of mechanism
    Hybrid court
    Name of mechanism
    Extraordinary Chambers of the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC)
    Name of accused
    Kaing Guek Eav
    Charges
    Kaing was indicted on 8 August 2008 and the indictment was confirmed and partially amended on 5 December 2008 for crimes against humanity, including torture (which incorporated one instance of rape) and grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions (Articles 5, 6 and 29 (new) (JCE through ‘committing’) of the ECCC Law) committed in Phnom Penh and within the territory of Cambodia between 17 April 1975 and 6 January 1979. Kaing held a central leadership role at the Security Center S-21, which he abused by training, ordering, and supervising staff in the systematic torture and execution of prisoners deemed to be enemies of the Democratic Kampuchea regime.
    Trial chamber verdict
    On 26 July 2010, the Trial Chamber convicted Kaing for crimes against humanity, including torture (which included one instance of rape) and grave breaches of the 1949 Geneva Conventions under the JCE. The rape as torture conviction related to the incident where an S-21 staff member inserted a stick into the vagina of a detainee during an interrogation.
    sentencing
    Kaing was sentenced to 35 years’ imprisonment by the Trial Chamber. However, the Supreme Court quashed this decision and instead sentenced him to life imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    On 6 July 6 2010, the Supreme Court confirmed and partly amended the conviction (the conviction for rape as torture as a crime against humanity remained standing). The Supreme Court stated the Trial Chamber had erred in law by attaching insufficient weight to the gravity of Kaing’s crimes as well as the aggravating circumstances in this case, and that that too much weight had been attached to the mitigating circumstances. Note that the Co-Prosecutors had requested that the Supreme Court Chamber cumulatively convict Kaing for both rape and torture as crimes against humanity. However, given the lack of support for the existence of rape as a distinct crime against humanity during the ECCC’s temporal jurisdiction, the Supreme Court Chamber found that the Trial Chamber erred in concluding that the incident that occurred at S-21 constituted rape as a crime against humanity. Accordingly, this part of the Co-Prosecutors’ appeal failed automatically. Rape was still charged and convicted as torture as a crime against humanity.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    Case 001
    Reparations / awards
    The Trial Chamber admitted 64 applicants as Civil Parties and awarded them reparations, which included inclusion of the names and their deceased family members in the judgment and the compilation and publication of all statements of apology and acknowledgement of responsibility made by Duch on the ECCC website.

  • Literature

    Haffajee, Rebecca L. - Prosecuting Crimes of Rape and Sexual Violence

    Year
    2006
    Issues
    Modes of Liability
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Accountability Akayesu Prosecution Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE)

    Reference link
    https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/65b3/e13e70452bd135177cd33ae7ef45a5fde0e1.pdf
    Full reference
    Haffajee, Rebecca L., "Prosecuting Crimes of Rape and Sexual Violence at the ICTR: The Application of Joint Criminal Enterprise Theory", in Harv. JL & Gender, 2006, vol. 29, no.1, pp. 201-221.
    Type of literature
    Journal Article
    Research focus
    Gaps in the Jurisprudence and Legislation on Conflict-related Sexual Violence crimes
    Author
    Haffajee, Rebecca L.
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Edouard Karemera (“Karemera et al.”)

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Genocidal Rape Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Sexual Violence as Genocide Superior Responsibility

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-98-44
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Edouard Karemera
    Charges
    - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide or deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction as genocide. -Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE III) and Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for the rapes and sexual violence committed against Tutsi women and girls committed by Interahamwe. (As for genocide and JCE III, the sexual violence committed after 11 April 1994; as for genocide and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe. As for crimes against humanity and JCE III, the sexual violence committed in Ruhengeri prefecture, Kigali-ville prefecture, Butare prefecture, Kibuye prefecture and Gitarama prefecture; as for crimes against humanity and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe).
    Trial chamber verdict
    Karemera was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 2 February 2012 of:- Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide or deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction as genocide-Rape as a crime against humanity
    sentencing
    Karemera received a sentence of life imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 29 September 2014 reversed the Trial Chamber’s finding that Karemera bore superior responsibility over the Kigali and/or Gisenyi Interahamwe in relation to the rapes and sexual assaults of Tutsi women committed outside Kigali from April to June 1994. The other sexual violence convictions by the Trial Chamber remained standing.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-98-44

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Jean Mpambara

    Year
    2006
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Acquittal Genocidal Rape Hutu Tutsi Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Aiding and Abetting

    Reference link
    http://www.unictr.org/en/cases/ictr-01-65
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Jean Mpambara
    Charges
    Mpambara was charged with the following sexual violence crimes: Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide or, alternatively, complicity in genocide under Article 6(1) (aiding and abetting by omission or, alternatively, JCE III) for acts of sexual violence committed against Tutsi women between 6 and 16 April 1994, including: (i) the rape of a Tutsi woman by two attackers in Gahini sector, in Rukara commune, on or about 8 April 1994; (ii) the rape of a pregnant Hutu woman married to a Tutsi man by multiple attackers in Nyawera sector, in Rukara commune, on or about 11 April 1994; and (iii) the rapes of a number of Tutsi women by soldiers during the attacks on Rukara parish between 7 and 16 April 1994.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Mpambara was found not guilty of all charges by the Trial Chamber on 12 September 2006, thus including sexual violence, and was acquitted.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Prosecution did not appeal the acquittal.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-01-65

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTR - Matthieu Ngirumpatse (“Karemera et al.”)

    Year
    2014
    Issues
    Modes of Liability Achievements and Challenges of Sexual Violence Prosecution
    Country
    Rwanda
    Keywords
    Superior Responsibility Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Sexual Violence as Genocide

    Reference link
    http://unictr.unmict.org/en/cases/ictr-98-44
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR)
    Name of accused
    Matthieu Ngirumpatse
    Charges
    - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide or deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction as genocide. -Rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE III) and Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for the rapes and sexual violence committed against Tutsi women and girls committed by Interahamwe. (As for genocide and JCE III, the sexual violence committed after 11 April 1994; as for genocide and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe. As for crimes against humanity and JCE III, the sexual violence committed in Ruhengeri prefecture,Kigali-ville prefecture, Butare prefecture, Kibuye prefecture and Gitarama prefecture; as for crimes against humanity and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe).
    Trial chamber verdict
    Ngirumpatse was found guilty by the Trial Chamber (on 2 February 2012) of: - Causing serious bodily or mental harm as genocide or deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction as genocide and rape as a crime against humanity under Article 6(1) (JCE III) and Article 6(3) (command responsibility) for the rapes and sexual violence committed against Tutsi women and girls committed by Interahamwe. As for genocide and JCE III, the sexual violence committed after 11 April 1994; as for genocide and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe. As for crimes against humanity and JCE III, the sexual violence committed in Ruhengeri prefecture, Kigali-ville prefecture, Butare prefecture, Kibuye prefecture and Gitarama prefecture; as for crimes against humanity and command responsibility, the sexual violence committed by the Kigali and Gisenyi Interahamwe.
    sentencing
    Ngirumpatse received a sentence of life imprisonment.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber on 29 September 2014 reversed the Trial Chamber’s finding that Ngirumpatse bore superior responsibility over the Kigali and/or Gisenyi Interahamwe in relation to the rapes and sexual assaults of Tutsi women committed outside Kigali from April to June 1994. The other sexual violence convictions by the Trial Chamber remain standing.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    ICTR-98-44

  • Jurisprudence judicial mechanism

    ICTY - Bruno Stojic (“Prlic et al.”)

    Year
    2017
    Issues
    Definitions/Elements of Sexual Violence Crimes
    Country
    Former Yugoslavia
    Keywords
    War Crimes Inhuman Treatment Imprisonment HVO Soldiers Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) Rape as Crime Against Humanity

    Reference link
    http://www.icty.org/cases/party/766/4
    Type of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal/Court
    Name of mechanism
    International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY)
    Name of accused
    Bruno Stojic
    Charges
    - Persecution as a crime against humanity, rape as a crime against humanity and inhuman treatment (sexual assault) as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime under Article 7(1) (JCE) for various sexual violence crimes.
    Trial chamber verdict
    Stojic was found guilty by the Trial Chamber on 29 May 2013 of: - Persecution as a crime against humanity, rape as a crime against humanity and inhuman treatment (sexual assault) as a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 as a war crime.
    sentencing
    Stojic was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment on 29 May 2013.
    Appeals chamber verdict
    The Appeals Chamber confirmed the charges and convictions made by the Trial Chamber on 29 November 2017.
    Status
    2715
    Case number
    IT-04-74

This is free software. Created with LinkAhead and Django. Licenced under AGPL version 3.0 (Sources).